Mood:okay
Topic: ???
S.O.C.:"Tournaquet " By Evanescence

AhH Peter ralley's the masses against me and my theory of perception. I don't know I won't argue with Peter and tried to persuade him it's a waste of time(not to be interpreted as a write off just accpetance of the fact that Peter will go ehhh...no in the end) Anyway but that's the great thing about the world you're free to think of what you like. I believe in perception because few things in my life have been concrete for long periods of time.Lum got me thinking to. I don't know I have a hard time agreeing with certain things is all.

I think what happened was I didn't make myself clear when I made some of the statements I made when I fist posted the whole one entry. How do I say this...well Peter stated it for me I think "The person you were five years ago, two years ago, today, etc., is not the grown up you. "Blah blah blah, I'm more mature than that, give me some credit" ... but it's true. If you don't believe me, just look at how you were at the beginning of this year! Even that's not the same. So you're still growing and changing... developing .... " That's what one of the things I'm saying. People are forever changing thus to say that someone is the one preordained by God to me is a little silly...unless you want to say that they've changed perhaps with you or like you or simply understand the metapmorphisis that you've endured. I'm not saying that there isn't someone for everyone...which might be how I come across I think that was the flaw in my last entry. I'm saying that.......the whole like I said preordained by God written in the stars crap makes me raise and eyebrow. Kinda like every damsel in distress has a prince on a white horse. Number one and excuse my terrible grammar that is comming I ain't no Damsel in Distress--I'm Utena in short. Number two No Prince on no horse thank you.

I do agree with this statements "the majority of people are willfully ignorant and submit to their fleeting passions, they often screw up things for themselves." (Peter), "I agree with Peter. The more direct you are with (a) people and (b) your wants/needs/etc., the better off you are in the long run. " (Lum) "We're not even close to halfway through our lives yet. So, no matter how much we've experienced right now, basing our past experiences of not even twenty years on how the rest of our lives are going to be is just plain silly. It'd be incorrect to say simply that "there's no one for me!" when we've hardly meandered along our own life spans. Anything can change at any time for ANY reason, so the best thing to do is to keep an open mind." (Lum)

Well anyway you all made good points that I agree with I wasn't saying there wasn't someone for everyone just...poking the traditonal definition of the one is all. Most people (by the way we are not people....the masses are people...we are us) expect utter perfection from the one ( I make this statement from today's hour and half of listeing to some girls talk about how their ideal person will be rich obediant cook and clean --no mention what so ever as to intellect and the like).

So that's why I decided to think on it and came up with these two ideas So thus either...A) the one is only a matter of perception at the time according to your physical and/ or emotional needs or B) the one is preordained but it's just a really a matter of both of you going through the experiences/tribulations to suit each other.

I feel as if I'm still not making myself clear...:sigh:: never mind it makes sense in my head.